The sale of this home would not have been completed if the Realtor Sally Cure had performed in an appropriate method representing the buyer, (me). Two attempts were recognized by the buyer (me) that the seller was attempting to removed "Attached" items of the property. Both attempts were brought to the attention of the realtor, immediately. On the first attempt, the Realtor, Sally Cure indicated to the buyer (me) the situation was resolved after a discussion with the seller and a concession of the Realtor Sally Cure to purchase a chandelier mounted in the dining room, then leaving that chandelier attached to the home for the buyer. The realtor also had indicated she had a discussion with the seller that he could not sell or remove "attached" items of the home, specifying curtains and other items. The Realtor Sally Cure indicated she instructed the seller, items attached to the home had to stay with the home, and made a concession to fund, from her commission, the sale of the chandelier in an effort to keep it with the home. A second attempt to sell items attached to the home was recognized by the buyer,(me) when I recognized items being sold on the internet, items that were "attachments" to the home. At this point, the I requested a dissolution of the sale of the home. The Realtor, Sally Cure, gave erroneous information to the buyer concerning the dissolution of the contract and the sale of the home, and coercion to complete the sale. Upon inspection of the home, it was recognized that items "attached" to the home had been removed. When indicated to the Realtor, Sally Cure, the realtor's response was "Prove it" in a manner to reflect coercion. This Realtor also did not distribute the Commission from the sale of the home to other Realtors involved. (Dawn originally showed this home to me) When asked to resolve this issue, the Realtor wanted signed documents to relieve them of their wrongdoing.